May 18, 2008

U.S.A. Social Networking Rankings

Filed under: Press Releases — admin @ 8:13 am
  • Hitwise ~ 4/08
    1 MySpace
    2 Facebook
    3 Youtube
    4 Craig’s List
    5 Yahoo! Answers
    6  MySpace TV
    7 Yahoo! Groups
    8 Yahoo! Member Directory   
    9 myYearBook
    10 Bebo
    11 Meebo  
    12 BlackPlanet 
    13 Craig’s List - Portland
    14 Tagged
    15 Craig’s List - New York  
    16 Craig’s List - Seattle
    17 Classmates
    18  Hi5
    19 Craig’s List - Los Angeles
    20 Yahoo! Message Boards
    21  Craig’s List - Minneapolis
    22 Google Groups
    23 Gaiaonline
    24 Yahoo! Messenger  
    25 Craig’s List - Sacramento
  • Nielsen Online ~ 3/08
    1. MySpace
    2. Facebook
    3. Classmates
    4. Linkedin
    5. Windows Live Space 
    6. Reunion 
    7. AOL Hometown  
    8. Club Penguin 
    9. AOL People Connection 
    10. Buzznet
    11.  Imeem
    12. Bebo
    13. Tagged.com
    14. Meetup
    15. Flixter
  • Comscore ~ 3/08 /Unique Visitors (000)
    1. MySpace (72,753)
    2. Blogger
    3. Facebook (35,510)
    4. WordPress
    5. Yahoo!Geocities
    6. AIM Dashboard
    7. Flickr (13,389)
    8. Classmates (14,064)
    9. Six Apart Sites
    10.  Lycos Tripod
    11. Reunion.com (9,003)
    12. AIM Profiles
    13. Windows Live Spaces   
    14. FreeWebs.com
    15. Yahoo Groups
    16. AOL Hometown
    17. Digg.com
    18. Angelfire.com
    19. Imeem (5,157)
    20. Buzznet
  • Danish Mobile Social Network ZYB Acquired By Vodafone For €31.5 million

    Filed under: Press Releases — admin @ 8:08 am

    Vodafone* today announces that it has agreed to acquire 100% of ZYB, a privately-owned company based in Denmark which operates a social networking and online management tool enabling mobile phone users to back-up and share their handsets’ contact and calendar information online. The acquisition will be made for a cash consideration of Eur31.5 million.

    The acquisition of ZYB is a further advance in the implementation of Vodafone’s Total Communications strategy which is delivering new revenue growth around fixed broadband, mobile advertising and a rich set of internet services that integrate the mobile and PC customer experience. ZYB fits into this strategy by enhancing the range of communications services Vodafone can provide to its customers.

    ZYB is unique amongst social networking sites as it is designed with the mobile device at its heart, allowing customers to share information and messages between their friends and colleagues who are held in their mobile phone’s address book.

    ZYB increases communication choices for customers enabling them to send messages and images from their PC to multiple mobile devices in their mobile community, as well as taking advantage of the functionality of an instant messaging service.

    Pieter Knook, Internet Services Director for Vodafone Group, said: “Vodafone understands that the core of any customer’s personal and business network is the set of contacts they hold on their mobile phone.

    “Using a web portal as a link between the PC and the mobile device, ZYB provides an interactive way for people to nurture, contact and develop their relationships with their most important friends and colleagues and builds links with those contacts’ wider networks. This is Web 2.0 in action.

    “This acquisition is consistent with our strategy of delivering products and services which meet our customers’ total communications needs.”

    Tommy Ahlers, CEO of ZYB, added: “I am delighted that ZYB is to join Vodafone, the world’s largest international mobile community.

    “Vodafone and ZYB share the same vision: to create a new mobile experience that builds on the convergence between the mobile and PC – and one which works on both platforms.

    “By joining a company with Vodafone’s global reach, ZYB has more opportunities to bring to the mobile a further advance to the rich and interactive communications experience which people already recognise via the internet on their PC.”

    ZYB will remain based in Denmark and upon acquisition will be incorporated into Vodafone’s Internet Services Division.

    * The purchaser of ZYB is Vodafone Europe BV, a holding company of Vodafone Group, based in The Netherlands.

    Source: www.techcrunch.com

    Facebook Blocks Google’s Friend Connect. There Goes the Open Web.

    Filed under: Press Releases — admin @ 8:06 am

    Facebook is all about openess, right? And privacy. It’s a balance, or something. Oftentimes it’s a tricky balance, but Facebook has self-instituted standards to live up to. And those standards say that Google’s new Friend Connect is evil (in so many words).

    As Friend Connect supposedly shares user data in a way that circumvents total disclosure to all users involved, Facebook has stated that Friend Connect does not comply with its standards for collecting user data and redistributing it across the web. The result? Friend Connect’s access to Facebook has been suspended.

    So much for the web platform coming to fruition in an easy, cooperative manner. Google still has Microsoft and Yahoo to compete with on the search level, but when it comes to the development of open standards, MySpace, Facebook and Google have become the battling trio.

    Between Friend Connect, Facebook Connect, and MySpace’s Data Availability on top of existing open platforms, the race is on to become the dominant, most widely adopted platform for such open standards. It’s quite dizzying at this point, and not so cooperative after all. Facebook has stated that it’s reached out to Google in order to find a way in which to reach a satisfactory level of compliance, so hopefully that will happen soon. Google does, after all, have a burning desire to own the universe’s data.

    Source: mashable.com

    Vodafone Buys Mobile Social Network ZYB for $50 Million

    Filed under: Press Releases — admin @ 8:00 am

    Amsterdam - International wireless carrier Vodafone (NYSE: VOD) announced on Friday that it has acquired Denmark-based mobile social network ZYB, for about $50 million in cash.

    ZYB allows users to share information, messages and media from their PCs with contacts in their phone’s address book.

    “Using a web portal as a link between the PC and the mobile device, ZYB provides an interactive way for people to nurture, contact and develop their relationships with their most important friends and colleagues and builds links with those contacts’ wider networks,” said Pieter Knook, Internet services director for Vodafone Group.

    “This acquisition is consistent with our strategy of delivering products and services which meet our customers’ total communications needs.”

    ZYB had to date raised about $4.7 million in venture capital.

    Source:www.dmwmedia.com

    Comcast buys social networking firm Plaxo for $175m

    Filed under: Press Releases — Tags: — admin @ 7:58 am

    SAN FRANCISCO - Social networking pioneer and inadvertent spammer Plaxo has been sold to cable and broadband company Comcast for between $145m and $175m.

    Plaxo launched in 2001 as an address-book synching tool before anyone had heard of social media.

    Last year, it launched its own social networking site Plaxo Pulse as a rival to Linkedin, although the site is more like Facebook in style.

    However, the relaunch still presented Plaxo with an uphill challenge because of its lingering negative reputation for being a prolific, if accidental, spammer.

    When first launched, Plaxo included a feature that would spam a users entire address book with offers to sign up to Plaxo. This “feature” was later turned off, but not before it had done a lot damage to the firm’s reputation.

    It is thought that Comcast will use Plaxo to build its own social networking offering to bring together its various online, email and mobile services. These include its video entertainment site Fancast, movie site Fandango and video publishing company thePlatform.

    Sam Schwartz, executive vice-president of Comcast Interactive Media, said: “Every social network is better the more end points you can connect with.

    “Plaxo will offer users the ability to share with friends on all Comcast screens going forward.”

    Ben Golub, CEO of Plaxo, said: “We intend to deliver on a vision of making social media a natural part of the lives of regular people, not just early-adopters.”

    Google and Facebook have been linked to Plaxo as potential suitors, but in the end both firms declined to make a bid when the social media firm touted itself around Silicon Valley.

    Like Google, Plaxo was founded by two Stanford engineering students, Todd Masonis and Cameron Ring. Also on board early was Napster co-founder Sean Parker, but he was forced out only to re-emerge as the founding president of Facebook.

    Plaxo is a supporter of the cross-platform social media alliance OpenSocial founded by Google and MySpace, and latterly joined by Yahoo!.

    It has also forged partnerships with other online firms, including Microsoft, Google, Mozilla and Yahoo!, as it strived to synch address books and calendars.

    Plaxo now claims to have 20m members, a rise of 5m from three years ago, in part because of a partnership with AOL.

    The two companies estimate that tying Plaxo with Comcast could create another 30m users. If true, it would represent a remarkable turnaround for Plaxo and make the $175m maximum price tag seem relatively cheap.

    Source: brandrepublic.com

    May 17, 2008

    Google hits top spot for first time

    Filed under: Press Releases — admin @ 1:32 pm

    Google has surpassed Yahoo to become the most popular website in the United States, according to comScore’s rankings by the number of unique monthly visitors.

    Google has long been the internet’s leader in search, but its audience has trailed Yahoo’s when counting other services such as email and photo sharing.

    April’s numbers, which internet tracking firm comScore plans to formally release on Thursday, show Google on top for the first time.

    The lead is tiny - 466,000 visitors out of about 141 million apiece. And while such measures are good as a gauge, they aren’t known for precision. In fact, rival rankings from Nielsen Online already had Google as the top web brand.

    Still, comScore’s finding is one more hint of Google’s dominance over internet pioneer Yahoo.

    Jack Flanagan, comScore’s executive vice president, said Google’s dominance in search creates “a halo effect” that can boost its other services.

    Google now has the Picasa online photo-sharing service, competing with Flickr from Yahoo. Google also has launched a site on finance, while its Gmail email service keeps growing - and competing with Yahoo.

    Google’s $US1.76 billion purchase of YouTube in November 2006 gave it the leading video-sharing website.

    According to comScore, Google’s unique U.S. audience in April was 141.1 million, an 18 per cent increase from the same month in 2007. Yahoo’s audience grew 7 per cent, to 140.6 million. Microsoft was third at about 121 million.

    That said, Yahoo still leads in page views, meaning visitors spend more time there or return more often. Many Google users make a simple search request and quickly go elsewhere based on the results. Yahoo had 33.6 billion page views to Google’s 28.7 billion.

    The comScore data come from its Media Metrix panel, recruited primarily using random phone-based techniques.

    ComScore recently took heat for its data on paid search clicks, which come from a larger panel that relies heavily on online recruitment techniques dismissed by many more traditional pollsters.

    In that case, however, Wall Street concerns that the faltering U.S. economy could bog down Google resulted largely from investors and analysts ignoring comScore’s advice on how to interpret the paid-click data. Google wound up surpassing the analysts’ predictions in producing a first-quarter profit of 30 per cent.

    Source: www.smh.com.au

    May 15, 2008

    Google PageRank Explained

    Filed under: Press Releases — admin @ 7:11 am

    Google PageRank or PR for short is numeric value assigned by Google to pages that represents how important a page is. The more important and known your pages are, the better PR they will get. PR is a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 is an unknown page for Google and 10 is the highest PR that can be assigned.

    PageRank provides the basis for all of web search tools. It is always updated by Google in order to improve it and optimize it.

    How is PageRank Calculated?
    No one knows for sure how PageRank is currently calculated by Google (except Google itself). Some speculations about the algorithm are made by webmasters all of them are based on the original PageRank published by Google.
    In essence, Google interprets a link for page A to page B as a vote by page A for page B. This means that page A is considered important (at least by page B).
    The more votes (more links) page A gets the higher its PR will be.

    Going into more details
    As stated above, the main factor in PR is links (or backlinks as they are called). But no all links weight the same when it comes to PR. So an ‘important’ page linking to you gives you more PR than a ‘less important’ one.
    There for you should always try to get backlinks from pages that have a high PR. These will benefit your page the most.
    Another factor in PR propagation is the number of out-links the ‘voting’ page have. So a PR4 page with only one out-link on it might give you more weight than a PR5 page with 100 out-links on it.
    An typical example here would be the famous milliondollarhomepage. This page is PR7 page with hunderds of out-links therefore its weight is would contribute very little to your page PR.

    How to increase my PageRank?
    Well as you would have probably guessed, PR can be increased by getting more backlinks for your page. The more backlinks and the higher quality they are the more your PR will be.
    Here are some tips:

    - Submit your site to directories.
    - Write important content to your site that would make people link to you.
    - Write articles and distribute them.
    - Although I don’t recommend it but some people recommend it: Do link exchanges.
    - Participate in forums (while adding your signature which includes a link to your site).
    - Buy some links on high PR pages.

    When does Google calculate PRs?
    Google calculates pages PRs once every few months, this is called PR update. After a PR update is done, all pages are assigned a new PR by Google and you will have this PR until a new PR update is done.
    New sites that were just launched will have a PR of 0 until an update is done by Google so that they are assigned an appropriate PR.

    Other ‘possible’ factors considered
    The following are some other factors might be considered by Google for calculating the PR lately:
    - Site age: The older the better, Google seems to like old sites.
    - Backlink relevancy: Googles seems to be taking into account how relevant is the page linking to you, if it is not that relevant, the link won’t weight much.
    - Backlink duration: How long was the backlink up? The more the better.

    Tools of the trade
    Google Page rank: http://www.googlepagerankchecker.com/
    Use this tool to discover your Google Page Rank (PR).

    Source:
    http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=95221

    Top 10 Search Engine Positioning Mistakes

    Filed under: Press Releases — admin @ 7:07 am

    that I see people making. By avoiding these mistakes, you can avoid a lot of anguish and frustration in the long run.1) Optimizing your site for the wrong keywords

    The first step in any search engine optimization campaign is to choose the keywords for which you should optimize your site.

    If you initially choose the wrong keywords, all the time and effort that you devote in trying to get your site a high ranking will go down the drain.

    If you choose keywords which no one search for, or if you choose keywords which won’t bring in targeted traffic to your site, what good will the top rankings do?

    In order to learn how you can choose the correct keywords for which you should optimize your site, see my article on this topic.

    Search Engine Positioning Mistakes explained here by Sumantra Roy

    2) Putting too many keywords in the Meta Keywords tag

    I often see sites which have hundreds of keywords listed in the Meta Keywords tag, in the hope that by listing the keywords in the Meta Keywords tag, they will be able to get a high ranking for those keywords.

    Nothing could be further from the truth. Contrary to popular opinion, the Meta Keywords tag has almost completely lost its importance as far as search engine positioning is concerned.

    Hence, just by listing keywords in the Meta Keywords tag, you will never be able to get a high ranking. To get a high ranking for those keywords, you need to put the keywords in the actual body content of your site.

    3) Repeating the same keyword too many times

    Another

    common mistake

    that people make is to endlessly repeat their target keywords in the body of their pages and in their Meta Keywords tags.Because so many people have used this tactic in the past (and continue to use it), the search engines keep a sharp lookout for this, and may penalize a site which repeats keywords in this fashion. Sure, you do need to repeat the keywords a number of times.

    But, the way you place the keywords in your pages needs to make grammatical sense. Simply repeating the keywords endlessly no longer works. Furthermore, a particular keyword should ideally not be present more than thrice in your Meta Keywords tag.

    Search Engine Positioning Mistakes explained here by Sumantra Roy

    4) Creating lots of similar doorway pages

    Another myth prevalent among people is that since the algorithm of each search engine is different, they need to create different pages for different search engines. While this is great in theory, it is counter-productive in practice.

    If you use this tactic, you will soon end up with hundreds of pages, which can quickly become an administrative nightmare. Also, just imagine the amount of time you will need to spend constantly updating the pages in response to the changes that the search engines make to their algorithms.

    Furthermore, although the pages are meant for different engines, they will actually end up being pretty similar to each other. The search engines are often able to detect when a site has created such similar pages, and may penalize or even ban this site from their index.

    Hence, instead of creating different pages for different search engines, create one page which is optimized for one keyword for all the search engines. In order to learn how to create such pages, see my article on this topic.

    5) Using Hidden Text

    Hidden text is text with the same color as the background color of your page. For example, if the background color of your page is white and you have added some white text to that page, that is considered as hidden text.

    Many webmasters, in order to get high rankings in the search engines, try to make their pages as keyword rich as possible. However, there is a limit to the number of keywords you can repeat in a page without making it sound odd to your human visitors. Thus, in order to ensure that the human visitors to a page don’t perceive the text to be odd, but that the page is still keyword rich, many webmasters add text (containing the keywords) with the same color as the background color.

    This ensures that while the search engines can see the keywords, the human visitors cannot. The search engines have long since caught up with this technique, and ignore or penalize the pages which contain such text. They may also penalize the entire site if even one of the pages in that site contain such hidden text.

    However, the problem with this is that the search engines may often end up penalizing sites which did not intend to use hidden text. For instance, suppose you have a page with a white background and a table in that page with a black background.

    Search Engine Positioning Mistakes explained here by Sumantra Roy

    Further suppose that you have added some white text in that table. This text will, in fact, be visible to your human visitors, i.e. this shouldn’t be called hidden text. However, the search engines can interpret this to be hidden text because they may often ignore the fact that the background of the table is black.

    Hence, in order to ensure that your site is not penalized because of this, you should go through all the pages in your site and see whether you have inadvertently made any such mistake.

    6) Creating Pages Containing Only Graphics

    The search engines only understand text - they don’t understand graphics. Hence, if your site contains lots of graphics but little text, it is unlikely to get a high ranking in the search engines.

    For improving your rankings, you need to replace the graphics by keyword rich text for the search engine spiders to feed on.

    7) Not using the NOFRAMES tag in case your site uses frames

    Many search engines don’t understand frames. For sites which have used frames, these search engines only consider what is present in the NOFRAMES tag. Yet, many webmasters make the mistake of adding something like this to the NOFRAMES tag: “This site uses frames, but your browser doesn’t support them”.

    For the search engines which don’t understand frames, this is all the text that they ever get to see in this site, which means that the chances of this site getting a good ranking in these search engines are non-existent. Hence, if your site uses frames, you need to add a lot of keyword rich text to the NOFRAMES tag. For more information on the different issues that arise when you use frames in your site, see my article on this topic.

    Search Engine Positioning Mistakes explained here by Sumantra Roy

    8) Using Page Cloaking

    Page cloaking is a technique used to deliver different web pages under different circumstances. People generally use page cloaking for two reasons:

    In order to hide the source code of their search engine optimized pages from their competitors and ii) in order to prevent human visitors from having to see a page which looks good to the search engines but does not necessarily look good to humans.

    The problem with this is that when a site uses cloaking, it prevents the search engines from being able to spider the same page that their users are going to see. And if the search engines can’t do this, they can no longer be confident of providing relevant results to their users.

    Thus, if a search engine discovers that a site has used cloaking, it will probably ban the site forever from their index. Hence, my advice is that you should not even think about using cloaking in your site. For more information on what page cloaking is, how it is implemented, and why you should not use cloaking, see my article on this topic.

    9) Using Automatic Submission Tools

    In order to save time, many people use an automatic submission software or service to submit their sites to the major search engines. It is true that submitting your site manually to the search engines takes a lot of time and that an automatic submission tool can help you save a lot of time.

    However, the search engines don’t like automatic submission tools and may ignore your pages if you use them. In my opinion, the major search engines are simply too important for you not to spend the time to submit your site manually to them.

    In order to speed up the process of submitting your site, you can use our free submission tool which allows you to submit your site manually to all the search engines, without having to go to the “ADD URL” pages of the individual engines. It is available here.

    10) Submitting too many pages per day

    People often make the mistake of submitting too many pages per day to the search engines.

    This often results in the search engines simply ignoring many of the pages which have been submitted from that site.

    Ideally, you should submit no more than 1 page per day to the search engines. While many search engines accept more than 1 page per day from a particular domain, there are some which only accept 1 page per day. Hence, by limiting yourself to a maximum of one page per day, you ensure that you stay within the limits of all the search engines.

    11) Devoting too much time to

    search engine positioning

    Yes - I lied. There’s another common mistake that people make when it comes to search engine optimization - they spend too much time over it.

    Search Engine Positioning Mistakes explained here by Sumantra Roy

    Sure, search engine placement is the most cost effective way of driving traffic to your site and you do need to spend some time every day learning how the search engines work and in optimizing your site for the search engines.

    However, you must remember that search engine optimization is a means to an end for you - it’s not the end in itself. The end is to increase the sales of your products and services. Hence, apart from trying to improve your

    site’s position in the search engines

    , you also need to spend time on all the other factors which determine the success or the failure of your web site - the quality of the products and services that you are selling, the quality of your customer service, and so on. You may have excellent rankings in the search engines, but if the quality of your products and services are poor, or if your customer service leaves a lot to be desired, those high rankings aren’t going to do much good.

    Source:
    http://www.goarticles.com

    May 12, 2008

    Google’s Sandox is Alive and Well - Official !

    Filed under: Press Releases — admin @ 8:18 am

    Sandboxes and Google

    Sandboxes are used to “quarantine” things in the real world (you keep all the sand in one place that way, in theory, but then again have you seen the trail from a kids sandbox?, still I digress), the term being also used with computers in relation to “dangerous things” like Active X controls etc.

    Google on the other hand are using it to “quarantine” nothing more harmless than new websites. Why are they doing this? They would say because so many new websites are (a) awful and will soon wither, so why bother with them, or (b) that they are the “creatures” on SEM companies whose sole aim is to artificially increase the rankings of another website through interlinking, and that therefore we are going to ignore them too.


    The Sandbox Effect

    Websites can linger in this Sandbox for 3 - 6 months and whilst you can reduce the detention period, it’s difficult to break a website out. Worst still, there is it appears a Sandbox Effect that lasts for up to 2 years! The effects here are mostly seen for high value (most searched for) keywords, where again research has shown that “new” sites (built after 2003) have little chance of good rankings on the Google engine.

    The Power of the Lesser used Keyword

    So what does this mean for businesses that want to get the most out of the internet and the promise that it offers? Simple, (a) don’t rely on Google alone (there are other engines out there) and (b) target the lesser keywords. You’ll be amazed just how many variations there in the words that people use when searching. Sure there are some that are used more often, but access to these is in effect barred to all new websites on Google (and can be hard to get for new websites anyway until they build up some momentum ) and besides all that, the number of searches for these “lesser” keywords is, when added together HUGE (just like your shopping receipt at Tescos - “How the hell did it add up to that, individually everything was so cheap?” being a thought that many must have had when reaching for the wallet/purse).

    So, if you are interested in getting the best out of your shiny new website, remember those “lesser sought after keywords” they could well be the answer to your problems for the first few years of your websites life.

    Graham Baylis Internet Marketing and Promotion Specialists www.TheWebIsTheWay.com “Making sure your needle is found in the Internet Haystack”

    Source:
    http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=94364

    Most enjoyed Top Search Engines

    Filed under: Press Releases — admin @ 8:16 am

    Top search engines do their best to provide the most relevant information, and it’s really interesting to find out which of them are most popular. One of investigations of 2006 year gives such result of usage top search Engines in USA:

    1. Google—42.7%.
    2. Yahoo!—28%.
    3. MSN—13.2%.
    4. AOL—7.6%.
    5. Ask—5.9%.

    Other search engines together possess 2.6% of all searching requests.
    This rate of top search engines doesn’t correlate to activities of other countries’ or the world’s searches at all, but it could have something in common with them.

    « Older PostsNewer Posts »

    Powered by WordPress